Download Ways of Knowing: Competing Methodologies in Social and by Jonathon Moses, Torbjørn Knutsen PDF

By Jonathon Moses, Torbjørn Knutsen

The revised moment variation of this cutting edge textbook on method in social and political technological know-how focuses centrally at the debate among positivist and constructivist ways. energetic and obtainable, the ebook introduces quite a number key matters which express how methodological pluralism should be mixed with highbrow rigor.

Show description

Read Online or Download Ways of Knowing: Competing Methodologies in Social and Political Research PDF

Similar methodology books

Culture in Minds and Societies: Foundations of Cultural Psychology

Briefly, tradition in Minds and Societies: Foundations of Cultural Psychology provides a brand new examine the connection among humans and society, produces a semiotic conception of cultural psychology and gives a dynamic therapy of tradition in human lives. This publication makes a decisive holiday from the post-modernist theoretical framework that considers wisdom as neighborhood and situation-specific.

Religionen erforschen: Kulturwissenschaftliche Methoden in der Religionswissenschaft

Das Studienbuch bietet einen aktuellen und praxisbezogenen Einblick in das Spektrum der Forschungsmethoden, die in der historisch orientierten und gegenwartsbezogenen Religionswissenschaft zum Einsatz kommen. Die Beitr? ge der eleven Autorinnen und Autoren bieten Studierenden somit eine erste Orientierung f?

Philosophy and the human sciences (Philosophical Papers 2)

Charles Taylor has been essentially the most unique and influential figures in modern philosophy: his 'philosophical anthropology' spans an surprisingly wide variety of theoretical pursuits and attracts creatively on either Anglo-American and Continental traditions in philosophy. a range of his released papers is gifted right here in volumes, established to point the course and crucial harmony of the paintings.

Ways of Knowing: Competing Methodologies in Social and Political Research

The revised moment variation of this leading edge textbook on technique in social and political technology focuses centrally at the debate among positivist and constructivist methods. vigorous and available, the e-book introduces a variety of key concerns which express how methodological pluralism will be mixed with highbrow rigor.

Additional resources for Ways of Knowing: Competing Methodologies in Social and Political Research

Sample text

In a sense, Galileo made rhings easier for them by blatandy staring that any discrepancy between his observations and those of Aristotle must be the result of Aristotle's shortcomings. As Church scholarship rested alrnost entirely on Aristotle's authoriry, Galileo's rumblíngs could not. be ignored. If Aristotle had been wrong, then a rhousand years of esrablished knowledge would tumble down arormd the ears of scholars evel"}where. The Stany Messenger is a milestone in the history of science. It is often seeo as the first true application of the scientific method - of a process that involves systematic observation, scrupulous note taking of things and patterns observed~ and thoughtful efforts to make sense of it all.

Durkheim - like Comte - longed to cut social science free from the metaphysical tendencies that dominated social thought in the nineteenth century. Toward that end, Durkheim went to great lengths to encourage sociologists to move away from the study of concepts and to focus on the study of things - most particularly, 'social facts'. Durkheim did this most evidently in his The Rufes of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Method (1964 [1895]). In this he lamented the lack of discussion among sociologists about the proper approach to social phenomena.

Knowledge and normative knowledge - remains important in naturalist science. It implies that science is based on facts, not on norms. This should not be interpreted to suggest that Hurne felt that values and beliefs were unimportant o r unworthy of scholarly investigation. His simple point was that they fali outside the purview of science proper. Science can help us to answer questions formulated about empirical events, but it cannot settle normative disputes - these must be left to theologians and philosophers (who, after 2,000 years of debate, still appear to be far from in agreement).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.84 of 5 – based on 16 votes